E-Bike Calorie Calculator

Calculate calories burned riding electric bikes with dual MET and power-based methods

kg
min

About the E-Bike Calorie Calculator

Learn more about the calculator and its creator

Jonas

Jonas

I have been a cyclist for over 10 years and I built this calculator to help cyclists like you and me with training and racing.

Understanding E-Bike Calorie Calculation

The E-bike calorie calculator offers two distinct methods for estimating energy expenditure: MET-based calculations that account for different assist levels, and power-based calculations using only the rider's contribution. This dual approach addresses the challenge of separating motor assistance from human effort in electric bicycle workouts.

Key Features

  • Dual Calculation Methods: Choose between MET-based and power-based approaches
  • Assist Level Recognition: Accounts for different levels of electric motor assistance
  • Rider-Only Power: Isolates human contribution when power meters are available
  • ACSM Integration: Uses validated cycling formulas for power-based calculations
  • Practical Application: Designed for real-world e-bike usage scenarios

Calculation Methods

Method A: MET-Based Approach

Uses metabolic equivalents adjusted for electric assistance levels:

Calories = MET × Body Weight (kg) × Duration (hours)
No Assist: MET 6.8 (traditional cycling)
Light Assist: MET 6.0 (minimal motor support)

Method B: Power-Based Approach

Uses ACSM cycling formula with rider-only power contribution:

Work Rate (kgm/min) = 6.12 × Rider Power (watts)
VO2 (ml/kg/min) = (10.8 × Rider Power) ÷ Body Weight + 7
Calories = (VO2 × Body Weight × Duration) ÷ 200

Key Inputs

  • Body Weight: Your body mass affects energy expenditure calculations
  • Duration: Total riding time in minutes
  • Assist Level (MET Method): Amount of electric motor assistance
  • Rider Power (Power Method): Your power contribution only, excluding motor output

Assist Level Guide

  • No Assist (MET 6.8): Electric motor turned off, traditional cycling effort
  • Light Assist (MET 6.0): Minimal motor support, rider provides majority of power

Power Measurement for E-Bikes

Measuring rider-only power on e-bikes requires specialized equipment:

  • Crank Power Meters: Measure power at the pedals before motor assistance
  • Hub Power Meters: Some models can separate rider vs motor contributions
  • Dual-Sided Systems: Advanced setups that measure total and motor power separately
  • Smart Trainers: Indoor trainers with e-bike simulation capabilities

Method Comparison

MET Method

Pros: Simple, no special equipment needed
Cons: Cannot separate motor vs rider output
Best for: General estimates, recreational riding

Power Method

Pros: Accurate rider contribution measurement
Cons: Requires specialized power meters
Best for: Training, precise calorie tracking

Example Calculations

MET Method Example

Commuter Ride:
Body Weight: 75 kg
Duration: 45 minutes (0.75 hours)
Assist Level: Light Assist (MET 6.0)

Calories = 6.0 × 75 × 0.75 = 338 kcal

Power Method Example

Training Ride with Power Meter:
Body Weight: 75 kg, Duration: 45 minutes
Rider Power: 120 watts (motor provides additional 80W)

Work Rate: 6.12 × 120 = 734 kgm/min
VO2: (10.8 × 120) ÷ 75 + 7 = 24.3 ml/kg/min
Calories: (24.3 × 75 × 45) ÷ 200 = 410 kcal

E-Bike Training Benefits

  • Extended Range: Ride longer distances without excessive fatigue
  • Hill Climbing: Tackle steeper terrain while still getting exercise
  • Commuting: Active transportation without arriving sweaty
  • Rehabilitation: Gradual return to cycling after injury
  • Age-Friendly: Maintains cycling activity as fitness declines

Limitations

  • MET Approach: Cannot separate motor vs rider output contributions
  • Power Method: Requires crank or hub power meter for rider-only measurements
  • Variable Assistance: Changing assist levels during ride not captured
  • Terrain Effects: Motor efficiency varies with speed and gradient
  • Battery State: Motor performance changes as battery depletes

Accuracy

  • MET Approach: Moderate ±25-35% (broad estimates due to motor variability)
  • Power Approach: Good ±10-15% (when rider-only power is accurately measured)

Choosing the Right Method

Use the MET method for general fitness tracking and when you don't have access to power measurement equipment. Choose the power method when you have a power meter that can isolate rider contribution and want accurate training data or precise calorie tracking for nutrition planning.